SoS Sat Report: The conclusion of the Synod will not be the end of something, but a new beginning
Debating of the draft final document has began
It is the final Monday of the Synod on Synodality, and the first draft of the final document of the Synod on Synodality is in the hands of the 351 Synodal delegates. The contents are confidential in “order to maintain a positive atmosphere for discussion.” Leaks will come though, especially as disagreements arise. The document seems to have been mostly written before this year’s Synodal session, as Jean-Claude Cardinal Hollerich SJ, the principle author, outlined “this is not just the product of the discussions in the assembly but draws on a rich process and incorporates all the work done over the years during the various phases of the synodal journey.” The other two authors are Fr. Giacomo Costa SJ and Msgr. Riccardo Battocchio.
The Synod has a drafting commission composed of Synod delegates, some ex-officio, some elected and some appointed by Pope Francis himself. They do not not draft the final document but instead they “supervise the work of the drafters.” The seven elected members are as follows: Fridolin Cardinal Ambongo Besungu, O.F.M. Cap., for Africa, Luis José Cardinal Rueda Aparicio for Central and South America, Prof. Catherine Clifford for North America, Fr. Clarence Sandanaraj Davedassan for Asia, Jean-Marc Cardinal Aveline for Europe, Bishop Mounir Khairallah for the Middle East and Eastern Churches, and Bishop Shane Anthony MacKinlay for Oceania. They join the ex-officio members, Jean-Claude Cardinal Hollerich, S.J., Mario Cardinal Grech, Msgr. Riccardo Battocchio, Fr. Giacomo Costa, S.J.; and three Pontifical appointees, Fr. Giuseppe Bonfrate, Filipe Neri António Sebastião Cardinal do Rosário Ferrão, and Sister Leticia Salazar.
Dilexit nos
The major news of the day is that Pope Francis has written the fourth encyclical of his Pontificate, which will be published on Thursday, October 24. It is entitled Dilexit nos, “He love us”, and will focus on devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, collecting reflections from previous magisterial texts. This might be the rare document in this Pontificate where the most cited person is not Pope Francis. It follows on from previous encyclicals; Lumen fidei (2013), on faith, which was almost entirely written by Pope Benedict XVI and completed a trilogy on the theological virtues; Laudato si' (2015) on the environment; and Fratelli tutti (2020) on human fraternity.
The timing of course is curious. Ostensibly it is to mark the 350th Anniversary of the first apparition of Our Lord to St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, but why now at the climax of a three year Synodal journey, that has been billed by the organisers themselves as one of the most important event in the history of the Church. The date itself of October 24th doesn’t appear to be significant to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. June would have been logical or December 27th, the 350th Anniversary of the first apparition. I far as I can tell the timing of this document is clearly aimed at taking away some of the limelight from the final document of the Synod which is expected to be published on Saturday. Why? Perhaps the document is a bit of a nothing burger, after all in the grand scheme of the things what really counts is the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation that Pope Francis will release probably around July next year (after the Pope has received the final reports of the various Study Groups studying issues raised in the first session of the Synod on Synodality last year). The cynic in me believes that that document is most written already, and will focus on a new way of understanding the exercise of papal primacy and the collegiality of bishops, with a nod by Synodality by emphasising listening to the people of God by reinforcement of some bureaucratic instruments that already exist.
Abundant fruits
The day began with a Votive Mass of the Holy Spirit celebrated at the Altar of the Chair in St. Peter’s Basilica by His Eminence Mario Cardinal Grech, with the Synod delegates concelebrating and/or assisting. This was a late addition to the calendar, and obviously done to more strongly tie the work of the Synod to the action of the Holy Spirit, ahead of the debate on the contents of the final document.
Cardinal Grech spent his sermon reflecting to be openness to the Holy Spirit. “We in these three years and in the two sessions of the Synodal Assembly can say that we have been able to discover "abundant fruits." We have rejoiced at the signs of vitality in each phase of the synodal journey, starting with the listening that characterized the first phase and involved all our communities. Our journey has been rich in fruits: it has helped us to see the gifts that are flourishing in the people of God today, without hiding our frailties and wounds.” I love Cardinal Grech’s enthusiasm for the process considering less that 2% of practicing Catholics had any involvement in the Synod. Signs of vitality indeed.
“We too, faced with the abundant fruits of the synodal journey, might ask ourselves the same question: what to do now? What to do with the abundant fruits we have gathered over these years? Perhaps we too, like the man in the parable, might realize that we do not have the proper means to guard the gifts we have discovered. Or perhaps, we see it, like the man in the parable, as the achievement of a goal: now there is nothing more to be done, we just have to enjoy the fruits we have received.”
Cardinal Grech continued, “The human being dies when he feels he has arrived and feels fulfilled”, adding “we too could run the risk of doing as this man did: hoarding what we have collected, the gifts from God that we have discovered, without reinvesting them, without living them as gifts received that we must now give back to the Church and the world, of feeling we have arrived!” These gifts, which presumably amount to listening to people who you have profound disagreements with without resorting to violence, in this day and age perhaps is something to nurture.
As an example, Fr. James Martin SJ said that at the first session last year “the words “disgusting,” “repulsive,” “unnatural” and “sick” were used regularly in conversations” to describe homosexuality, and that he sat there and listened attentively to the views that were expressed by his fellow Synod delegates.
Cardinal Grech would continue “We must overcome the temptation to believe that the fruits we have harvested are our work and our possession: we must receive everything as a gift from God,” adding “And what is the way forward? We are celebrating the Votive Mass of the Holy Spirit. The way to take is that of the Spirit of God. In fact, only the Holy Spirit can enable us to remain open to the newness of God.”
He conclude, “if we listen to the voice of the Spirit, then we will be able to identify new paths and "as pilgrims of hope let us continue to advance along the synodal path towards those who still await the proclamation of the Good News of salvation!" If we listen to the voice of the Spirit, the conclusion of this synodal assembly will not be the end of something, but a new beginning, so that "the Word of God may spread and be glorified." The expectations of the Synod organisers are sky high, putting all their hopes on Synodality, which as far as I can tell is a form of attentive listening Church style. It is going to take more than that to convince the faithful, who you are going to need to take along with you, without whom there is no Church.
God’s providence is at work in this Assembly
Later in the morning, now in the Paul VI Audience Hall and before the delegates got the draft document in their hands, they listened to a meditation by cardinal-designate Fr. Timothy Radcliffe OP.
Fr. Radcliffe focused on freedom, as delegates debate, propose amendments, and vote on the final document. “We may be disappointed with the decisions of the Synod”, adding, “some of us will consider these to be ill-advised or even wrong.” “We can be at peace because nothing can separate us from the love of God, not even incompetence, not even mistakes.” True words.
On the actual debating of the final document he said, “we need not be afraid of disagreement, for the Holy Spirit is at work in it”, adding “this is our freedom, to think, speak and to listen without fear. But this is nothing unless we also have the freedom of those who trust that ‘God works all for the good of those who love God.’ So we may be at peace with whatever is the result.”
I think the one clear thing that the Synods of his Pontificate have done, principally by being held behind closed doors and secretively, is highlight, expose, and I would argue exacerbate the divisions that have arisen in the Church since Vatican II. As I have said previously, role of the Pope now will be ensuring unity from the division that has arisen, which is not going to be a simple task, and why he needs our constant prayers.
Fr. Radcliffe continued, “So even if you are disappointed by the result of the Synod, God’s providence is at work in this Assembly, bringing us to the Kingdom in ways that God alone knows.”
He concluded by saying “If we have only the freedom to argue for our positions, we shall be tempted by the arrogance of those who, in the words of de Lubac, see themselves as ‘the incarnate norm of orthodoxy.’ We shall end up beating the drums of ideology, whether of the left or the right.” So in effect he saying that having “listened in the Spirit” to each other for two months, nobody has changed their minds, and the higher ups are praying that this week doesn’t cause the ideologues who lose the battle for the final document don’t try to promote a schism.
At this moment the question of the female diaconate is not ripe
Talking of ideologues who refuse to accept the perineal teaching of the Church, in this case on Holy Orders, this morning Cardinal Tucho Fernández addressed the Synod on the topic of women deacons. His intervention was published, read it here in Italian.
The first thing he did was explain why he wasn’t present at the meeting of Study Group 5, which is looking at the female diaconate among other issues, with Synod delegates. To surprise of everyone, he said he is not the coordinator of that Study Group. In fairness to him he never said he was, the Vatican never said he was, we just assumed, including the Synod delegates, that he was because he delivered the update on the work of Study Group 5 to Synod on the first day of this assembly.
The coordinator of Study Group 5 had undergone a medical procedure on the day of the meeting and therefore could not attend. We still don’t know who he is. Tucho thought, that as he is not the coordinator he wasn’t obliged to go to that meeting, instead sending two very junior staffers from the Vatican’s Doctrinal Office, who had less idea about the workings of the study group than the Synod delegates themselves. Tucho and Mister mysterious coordinator will be available to discuss Study Group 5 with Synod delegates on Friday afternoon.
On the topic of the female diaconate Cardinal Fernandez, said Pope Francis has expressed that “at this moment the the question of the female diaconate is not ripe”, adding that "the commission studying the topic has reached partial conclusions, which will be made public at the appropriate time.” The commission on women deacons is headed by Giuseppe Cardinal Petrocchi, who or may not be the coordinator of Study Group 5.
Interestingly, Cardinal Fernandez made it clear that Pope Francis has asked him explore alternative ways to elevate women's leadership within the Church that are not focused on the Sacrament of Holy Orders. He cited the example of the catechist, recently instituted as a new ministry by Pope Francis. Tucho also lamented that limited uptake of the ministry of acolyte by women, saying this “has been granted in only a small percentage of dioceses”, and blaming “local priests' reluctance to nominate women for the role.”
He also criticized the limited adoption of the male diaconate in many parts of the world, noting that, in some places, deacons are perceived merely as "ordained altar boys." This is a strange criticism. In the place where there are no permanent deacons, like in Africa, there is an abundance of priestly vocations, and conversely in places, particularly in Europe, where permanent deacons are a mainstay, there is a dearth of priestly vocations.
With these examples, Tucho said the rush to “ordain women as deacons is not the most pressing solution to promoting women's participation in the Church”, emphasising the need to reflect how women can assume leadership roles in the Church without being “restricted by priestly power.” “There is nothing in the nature of women that prevents them from holding very important positions in the leadership of the Church.”
Pope Francis is clearly against clericalizing women. He is against a female diaconate and a female priesthood. That much has been clear to anyone who has ears for last 11 years. I do however disagree with the way the Pope is handling the situation. The Holy Father is playing with the hopes of these women, who have delusions of the impossible, a female priesthood, making them question their faith, by constantly giving them false hope of change by establishing these commissions. I say this because these women genuinely believe that by having endless commissions, eventually one is going to give them the answer they desire, completely forgetting that Pope Francis, on more than one occasion, has said that ‘if you don’t want anything done in the Church, form a commission.’ Yes, I said that these activists want a female priesthood, to them the diaconate is the thin edge to wedge the door open. It is never going to happen, and it is high time they reconcile themselves to this fact, for their sanity if nothing else.
The Clericalist Mindset
At the today’s Synod press briefing the panel comprised of cardinal-designate Fr. Timothy Radcliffe OP, Matteo Cardinal Zuppi, Archbishop of Bologna, Bishop Manuel Nin Güell, OSB., Apostolic Exarch of Greece, and Sr. Nathalie Becquart, XMCJ, Undersecretary of the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops.
Press Conference was uneventful save from a rather bizarre moment when Hendro Mustermann, a Dutch theologian who works as a journalist for Netherlands Dagblad, a Dutch daily newspaper, said that despite knowing “all the theology” that excludes women from the priesthood, “I know all of it Ordinatio sacerdotalis, Hans Urs von Balthasar”, he said, adding “now I’m unable to explain it [Church teaching on Holy Orders],” to his two daughters. He claims that “this exclusion is standing between them and Christ”, and asked the panel for some help explaining the Church’s teaching to them.
Fr. Radcliffe warned that Mustermann and his daughters are “slipping into a very clerical mindset”, urging them “not to focus solely on ordination but to also consider the higher positions women have held throughout history as Doctors of the Church.”
Sr. Becquart emphasizing that women already hold top level positions in the Church, such as presidents of Catholic universities, leaders of organizations like Caritas, and heads of sections within Episcopal Conferences.
Now we wait to see what the next days will bring. Expect leaks of the final draft (from the Germans), and not much from the Vatican’s communication apparatus. We will bring you more news and analysis, though it may be thin this week before the late night scramble on Saturday.
Can we all agree that the, ‘Infallible’, God Authorized Church Leaders, Church Synod and Church Council of Caiaphas in 33 A.D., in spite of having the Holy Spirit with them, failed miserably! With Jesus Incarnate, St. Peter and the Holy Spirit participating in the Church Council of Caiaphas, many Catholics would think the Church Council of Caiaphas should be seen by the Catholic Church as infallible. Also, when Jesus, ‘‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be dispersed’ in Apocalyptic times, is the shepherd struck by Jesus, infallible?
I see a similarity between the infallible God Authorized Church leader Caiaphas’ Synod, and Pope Francis’ Synod. Both Caiaphas and Pope Francis had years of studying the teachings from Jesus ahead of their Church Councils. Jesus Himself, along with St. Peter and the Holy Spirit, participated in the infallible God Authorized Church, Church Synod and Council of Caiaphas in 33 AD. To me, it seems obvious as to what caused the infallible Church Council of Caiaphas to fail. Other Catholics may want to put our best Catholic Theologians on it, to do decades of intense research, in order to figure out how God’s infallible God Authorized, Church Leaders of the Church Council of Caiaphas, along with Jesus Incarnate, St. Peter and the Holy Spirit, could have failed.
Matthew 26:57 Jesus Before the Sanhedrin.
Those who had arrested Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled. Peter was following him at a distance as far as the high priest’s courtyard, and going inside he sat down with the servants to see the outcome. The chief priests and the entire Sanhedrin kept trying to obtain false testimony against Jesus in order to put him to death, but they found none, though many false witnesses came forward. Finally two came forward who stated, “This man said, ‘I can destroy the temple of God and within three days rebuild it.’” The high priest rose and addressed him, “Have you no answer? What are these men testifying against you? But Jesus was silent. Then the high priest said to him, “I order you to tell us under oath before the living God whether you are the Messiah, the Son of God.” Jesus said to him in reply, “You have said so. But I tell you:
From now on you will see ‘the Son of Man
seated at the right hand of the Power’
and ‘coming on the clouds of heaven.’”
Then the high priest tore his robes and said, “He has blasphemed! What further need have we of witnesses? You have now heard the blasphemy; what is your opinion?” They said in reply, “He deserves to die!” Then they spat in his face and struck him, while some slapped him, saying, “Prophesy for us, Messiah: who is it that struck you?”
When we see Jesus’ Matthew 24 sign for Jesus’ Second Coming, which is the “Desolating Abomination” “Standing in the Holy Place”, this triggers another Apocalyptic event. Jesus says that He will strike the Shepherd so His sheep will be dispersed. Which makes sense. Jesus doesn't want His Faithful to follow a “Desolating Abomination”.
Zechariah 13:7 Oracles Concerning the End of False Prophecy. The Song of the Sword.
Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, against the one who is my associate—oracle of the LORD of hosts. Strike the shepherd that the sheep may be scattered; I will turn my hand against the little ones. In all the land—oracle of the LORD—two thirds of them will be cut off and perish, and one third will be left. I will bring the one third through the fire; I will refine them as one refines silver, and I will test them as one tests gold. They will call upon my name, and I will answer them; I will say, “They are my people,” and they will say, “The LORD is my God.”
There is a slight difference in Jesus’ delivery in His apocalyptic quote from Zechariah. Zechariah’s prophecy states “strike the shepherd...” Jesus quotes it as, “I will strike the shepherd…”. USCCB Bible notes reference both Zechariah 13 and Matthew 24 “The Destruction of the Temple Foretold”, to Jesus’ Matthew 26:31 ‘I will strike the shepherd and the sheep of the flock will be dispersed’, quote.
Matthew 26:31
‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be dispersed’
USCCB NABRE Bible Note for Matthew 26:31
Will have…shaken: literally, “will be scandalized in me”; see note on Mt 24:9–12. I will strike…dispersed: cf. Zec 13:7.
Matthew 24 The Destruction of the Temple Foretold
USCCB NABRE Bible Note for Matthew 24:9-12
Matthew has used Mk 13:9–12 in his missionary discourse (Mt 10:17–21) and omits it here. Besides the sufferings, including death, and the hatred of all nations that the disciples will have to endure, there will be worse affliction within the church itself. This is described in Mt 24:10–12, which are peculiar to Matthew. Will be led into sin: literally, “will be scandalized,” probably meaning that they will become apostates; see Mt 13:21 where “fall away” translates the same Greek word as here. Betray: in the Greek this is the same word as the hand over of Mt 24:9. The handing over to persecution and hatred from outside will have their counterpart within the church. False prophets: these are Christians; see note on Mt 7:15–20. Evildoing: see Mt 7:23.
Jeremiah 23:1 A Just Shepherd.
Woe to the shepherds who mislead and scatter the flock of my pasture, says the LORD.
Therefore, thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, against the shepherds who shepherd my people: You have scattered my sheep and driven them away. You have not cared for them, but I will take care to punish your evil deeds. I myself will gather the remnant of my flock from all the lands to which I have driven them and bring them back to their meadow; there they shall increase and multiply. I will appoint shepherds for them who will shepherd them so that they need no longer fear and tremble; and none shall be missing, says the LORD.
Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will raise up a righteous shoot to David; as king he shall reign and govern wisely, he shall do what is just and right in the land. In his days Judah shall be saved, Israel shall dwell in security. This is the name they give him:
"The LORD our justice."
Matthew 24:3 The Great Tribulation
“Tell us, when will this happen, and what sign will there be of your coming, and of the end of the age?”...
…“When you see the desolating abomination spoken of through Daniel the prophet standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then those in Judea must flee to the mountains...
...for at that time there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever will be.
Lightning destroyed key, hand of St. Peter statue in Argentina on Pope Francis’ birthday
www.lifesitenews.com/news/lightning-st-peter-statute-pope-francis/
Divine Mercy in My Soul, 635 The Blessed Virgin Mary
... you have to speak to the world about His great mercy and prepare the world for the Second Coming of Him who will come, not as a merciful Savior, but as a just Judge. Oh, how terrible is that day! Determined is the day of justice, the day of divine wrath. The angels tremble before it. Speak to souls about this great mercy while it is still the time for [granting] mercy. If you keep silent now, you will be answering for a great number of souls on that terrible day. …
Acts of the Apostles 26:17
I shall deliver you from this people and from the Gentiles to whom I send you, to open their eyes that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God,
Matthew 6:9 The Lord's Prayer
your kingdom come,
your will be done on earth as it is in heaven .../
/... Subject us not to trial but
deliver us from the evil one.'
Divine Mercy in My Soul, 429
I heard these words spoken distinctly and forcefully within my soul, You will prepare the world for My final coming.
Jesus is Getting Married!
www.apocalypseangel.com/married.html